# @ⁿᵃʰᵘᵃᵗˡ.ⁱⁿ.ᵗᵒᵖᵒˡᵒᵍʸ.ᵉˣᵗʳᵃᶜᵗᵃ ## Multidimensional Executable Grammar: Particle “in” ### L003 Generation Protocol
# @ⁿᵃʰᵘᵃᵗˡ.ⁱⁿ.ᵗᵒᵖᵒˡᵒᵍʸ.ᵉˣᵗʳᵃᶜᵗᵃ
## Multidimensional Executable Grammar: Particle “in”
### L003 Generation Protocol
---
## @ᶜᴼᴿᴱ.ᴼᴾᴱᴿᴬᵀᴼᴿ.ᴵᴺ
### @ᶠᵁᴺᴰᴬᴹᴱᴺᵀᵁᴹ.ᴹᵁᴸᵀᴵⱽᴬᴸᴱᴺˢ
```
Ψ(in) = ⟨MULTIFUNCTIONAL_OPERATOR⟩
TOPOLOGY_MAP:
in → {
ARG_MARKER : 0.73 [primary]
DEFINITE_ART : 0.68 [overlapping]
RELATIVIZER : 0.45
COMPLEMENTIZER: 0.32
SUBORDINATOR : 0.28
TEMPORAL_MARK : 0.19
COMPARATIVE : 0.12
}
```
**@ᶠᴿᴱᵟᵁᴱᴺᵀᴵᴬ.ᴰᴬᵀᵁᴹ** (empirical):
```
FLORENTINE_CODEX_STATISTICS:
Total occurrences: ~42,000 instances
Word frequency rank: #2 (after subject prefixes)
Distribution:
- Argument marking: 73%
- Relative clauses: 15%
- Subordination: 8%
- Other functions: 4%
```
---
## @ᴬᴿᴳᵁᴹᴱᴺᵀ.ᴹᴬᴿᴷᴵᴺᴳ.ᵀᴼᴾᴼᴸᴼᴳʸ
### @ᴾᴿᴵᴹᴬᴿʸ.ᶠᵁᴺᶜᵀᴵᴼ
**@ᴬᴸᴳᴼᴿᴵᵀᴴᴹᵁˢ.ᴮᴬˢᴵᶜᵁˢ**:
```python
def in_as_arg_marker(NP, PRED):
“”“
Core argument marking algorithm
“”“
CONTEXT = {
‘position’: postverbal_preferred,
‘semantic’: {
‘definiteness’: tends_definite,
‘specificity’: tends_specific,
‘topicality’: tends_high,
‘discourse_given’: tends_presupposed
},
‘syntactic’: {
‘cross_reference’: REQUIRED(verb_agreement),
‘word_order’: flexible_but_patterned
}
}
STRUCTURE:
PRED + in + NP
RETURN: ⟨in marks NP as ARG of PRED⟩
```
**@ᴱˣᴱᴹᴾᴸᴬ.ᴾᴬᵀᵀᴱᴿᴺᴵ**:
```
1. mihtōtia in tēuctli
[VSO pattern]
V: mihtōtia (dances-3SG)
S: in tēuctli (the lord)
→ “the lord dances”
2. ōquicōuh in tlācatl in tlaxcalli
[VSO pattern with 2 args]
V: ōquicōuh (bought-it-3SG)
S: in tlācatl (the man)
O: in tlaxcalli (the tortilla)
→ “the man bought the tortilla”
3. ōquicōuh in tlaxcalli in tlācatl
[VOS pattern with 2 args]
V: ōquicōuh (bought-it-3SG)
O: in tlaxcalli (the tortilla)
S: in tlācatl (the man)
→ “the man bought the tortilla”
```
### @ᴾᴬᴿᴬᴰᴼˣ.ᴰᴱᶠᴵᴺᴵᵀᴱᴺᴱˢˢ
**@ⁿᵒⁿ.ʳⁱᵍⁱᵈ.ˢᵉᵐᵃⁿᵗⁱᶜˢ**:
```
PARADOX: in ≠ strict_definite_article
EVIDENCE:
1. in + PROPER_NAME:
in Motēuczōmah → “Moctezuma” [already definite!]
in Huitzilopochtli → “Huitzilopochtli”
2. in + POSSESSED_NP:
in ītōcā → “his name” [already definite via possession!]
in īteōuh → “his god”
3. in + BARE_NP_indefinite_reading:
nicchīhuaz in tleh in ticnequiz
“I shall do whatever you want”
[tleh = ‘what/something’ - NON-specific]
4. ahmō itlah molcāhuaz
“nothing is forgotten”
[itlah = ‘something’ - but negative context]
CONCLUSION:
in = ARGUMENT_MARKER > definite_article
PRIMARY_FUNCTION: syntactic (marks ARG role)
SECONDARY_EFFECT: pragmatic (tends toward definite/specific reading)
```
### @ᴮᴬᴿᴱ.ᴺᴾ.ᶜᴼᴺᵀᴿᴬˢᵀ
**@ᵛˢ.ⁱⁿ.ᴺᴾ.ᵈⁱˢᵗʳⁱᵇᵘᵗⁱᵒⁿ**:
```
BARE_NP (without ‘in’):
- indefinite/nonspecific reading
- incorporated objects
- predicate nominals
- VOS order preference
EXAMPLE:
nitlaxcalchihua
“I tortilla-make” [incorporated]
ōquicōuh tlaxcalli in tlācatl
“the man bought tortilla(s)” [VOS, indefinite O]
in + NP:
- definite/specific reading
- full arguments (not incorporated)
- VSO order preference (but flexible)
- topical/presupposed status
EXAMPLE:
ōquicōuh in tlācatl in tlaxcalli
“the man bought the tortilla” [VSO, definite O]
```
---
## @ᴿᴱᴸᴬᵀᴵⱽᴵᶻᴬᵀᴵᴼᴺ.ᵀᴼᴾᴼᴸᴼᴳʸ
### @ᴴᴱᴬᴰᴸᴱˢˢ.ᴿᴱᴸᴬᵀᴵⱽᴱ.ᶜᴸᴬᵁˢᴱˢ
**@ᴬᴸᴳᴼᴿᴵᵀᴴᴹᵁˢ**:
```python
def in_as_relativizer(VERB_PHRASE):
“”“
Headless relative clause formation
“”“
STRUCTURE:
in + VERB → ⟨the one who VERB⟩
in + VERB-PL → ⟨those who VERB⟩
FUNCTION:
- nominalizes VP
- creates free relative
- fills NP slot in matrix clause
SEMANTICS:
- generic or specific reference
- determined by context
RETURN: NP_derived_from_VP
```
**@ᴱˣᴱᴹᴾᴸᴬ.ᴾᴬᵀᵀᴱᴿᴺᴵ**:
```
1. in cuīca
in + cuīca(3SG.sing)
→ “the one who sings” / “the singer”
2. in cuīcah
in + cuīcah(3PL.sing)
→ “those who sing” / “the singers”
3. in mihtōtiah
in + mihtōtiah(3PL.dance)
→ “those who dance” / “the dancers”
4. in tlamatini
in + tlamatini(wise.one)
→ “the wise one” / “the sage”
[Note: tlamatini already nominalized via -ni]
5. in ōquicōuh
in + ō-qui-cōuh(PERF-3OBJ-buy-3SG)
→ “the one who bought it”
```
### @ᴴᴱᴬᴰᴱᴰ.ᴿᴱᴸᴬᵀᴵⱽᴱ.ᶜᴸᴬᵁˢᴱˢ
**@ˢᵀᴿᵁᶜᵀᵁᴿᴬ**:
```
HEAD_NOUN + in + RELATIVE_CLAUSE
PATTERN:
NP[head] + [in + VP[relative]]
FUNCTION:
- in introduces modifying clause
- clause modifies head noun
- gap in relative clause co-indexed with head
EXAMPLE:
in tlācatl in ōquicōuh in tlaxcalli
“the man who bought the tortilla”
PARSING:
HEAD: in tlācatl (the man)
REL_MARKER: in
REL_CLAUSE: ōquicōuh in tlaxcalli
(who bought the tortilla)
```
**@ᴳᴬᴾ.ᴬᴺᴬᴸʸˢᴵˢ**:
```
GAPPING_STRATEGY:
in tlācatl [in [GAP ōquicōuh in tlaxcalli]]
↑ ↑
REL extracted_SUBJ
- Subject of relative clause = HEAD
- Gap left in subject position
- Cross-referenced by verb agreement
```
---
## @ᶜᴼᴹᴾᴸᴱᴹᴱᴺᵀᴵᶻᴬᵀᴵᴼᴺ.ᵀᴼᴾᴼᴸᴼᴳʸ
### @ᴺᴼᴹᴵᴺᴬᴸ.ᶜᴼᴹᴾᴸᴱᴹᴱᴺᵀˢ
**@ᴬᴸᴳᴼᴿᴵᵀᴴᴹᵁˢ**:
```python
def in_as_complementizer(MATRIX_V, COMPLEMENT_CLAUSE):
“”“
Nominal complement clauses
“”“
MATRIX_VERBS = {
‘perception’: [itta ‘see’, caqui ‘hear’, mati ‘know’],
‘cognition’: [neltoca ‘believe’, ilnamiqui ‘remember’],
‘speech’: [itoa ‘say’, nahuatia ‘command’]
}
STRUCTURE:
MATRIX_V + [in + COMPLEMENT_S]
FUNCTION:
- embeds clause as argument
- nominal status of complement
- similar to English ‘that’
RETURN: embedded_proposition
```
**@ᴱˣᴱᴹᴾᴸᴬ.ᴾᴬᵀᵀᴱᴿᴺᴵ**:
```
1. niqui tta in tiquichihua
ni-qu-itta in ti-qui-chihua
1SG-3OBJ-see COMP 2SG-3OBJ-make
→ “I see that you make it”
2. niquimati in ca teōtl
ni-qui-mati in ca teōtl
1SG-3OBJ-know COMP DECL god
→ “I know that (it) is a god”
3. nitoa in ōquicōuh
ni-toa in ō-qui-cōuh
1SG-say COMP PERF-3OBJ-buy-3SG
→ “I say that he bought it”
```
---
## @ˢᵁᴮᴼᴿᴰᴵᴺᴬᵀᴵᴼᴺ.ᵀᴼᴾᴼᴸᴼᴳʸ
### @ᴬᴰⱽᴱᴿᴮᴵᴬᴸ.ᶜᴸᴬᵁˢᴱˢ
**@ᵀᴱᴹᴾᴼᴿᴬᴸ.ᴱˣᴾᴿᴱˢˢᴵᴼᴺˢ**:
```
PATTERN: in + TIME_EXPRESSION
STRUCTURES:
1. in ācallahco → “when dawn breaks”
2. in ye ōnmic → “when already he died”
3. in ōtlathui → “when it dawned”
FUNCTION:
- temporal subordination
- establishes time frame
- ‘in’ = “when/at the time that”
```
**@ᴸᴼᶜᴬᵀᴵⱽᴱ.ᴱˣᴾᴿᴱˢˢᴵᴼᴺˢ**:
```
PATTERN: in + PLACE_EXPRESSION
STRUCTURES:
1. in cān → “where/the place where”
2. in nican → “here/in this place”
3. in oncān → “there/in that place”
FUNCTION:
- spatial subordination
- locative modification
- relativization of place
```
---
## @ᶜᴼᴹᴾᴬᴿᴬᵀᴵⱽᴱ.ᶜᴼᴺˢᵀᴿᵁᶜᵀᴵᴼᴺˢ
### @ᴹᴬᴺᴺᴱᴿ.ᶜᴼᴹᴾᴬᴿᴵˢᴼᴺ
**@ᴾᴬᵀᵀᴱᴿᴺˢ**:
```
1. in quēnin → “as/in what manner”
2. iuhqui in → “as/like”
EXAMPLE: nichihua iuhqui in ti-chihua
“I do as you do”
3. in īc → “in what way/thereby”
EXAMPLE: in īc nelli → “in what way (it is) true”
```
---
## @ᶜᴼᴸᴸᴼᶜᴬᵀᴵᴼᴺ.ᴾᴬᵀᵀᴱᴿᴺˢ
### @ᶠᴵˣᴱᴰ.ᴱˣᴾᴿᴱˢˢᴵᴼᴺˢ
**@ᶜᴼᴹᴹᴼᴺ.ᶜᴼᴹᴮᴵᴺᴬᵀᴵᴼᴺˢ**:
```
PHONOLOGICALLY_FUSED:
ca + in → often written “cain”
→ “indeed the”
ō + in → written “ōin”
→ “already the” / “when”
ye + in → “yeīn”
→ “already the” / “now the”
FREQUENTLY_OCCURRING:
in ācah → “he who/anyone who” (relative)
in itlah → “that which/something” (relative)
in cān → “where/the place where”
in īc → “thereby/in what way”
in quēnin → “as/in what manner”
```
---
## @ᴰᴵˢᵀᴵᴺᶜᵀᴵᴼ.ᶜᴬ.ⱽˢ.ᴵᴺ
### @ᶜᴼᴹᴾᴸᴱᴹᴱᴺᵀᴬᴿʸ.ᴰᴵˢᵀᴿᴵᴮᵁᵀᴵᴼ
```
COMPLEMENTARY_DISTRIBUTION:
ca → [+declarative, +assertive, predicate-initial]
in → [+argument, +subordinate, follows_ca_or_verb]
INTERACTION:
ca + in + NP + PRED
STRUCTURE:
DECL + ARG + COMMENT
EXAMPLE:
ca in Huitzilopochtli teōtl
“indeed Huitzilopochtli (is) a god”
PARSING:
ca: declarative force
in Huitzilopochtli: topic/subject
teōtl: predicate nominal
```
**@ˢᵞᴺᵀᴬᶜᵀᴵᶜ.ˢᴸᴼᵀˢ**:
```
PARTICLE_CHAIN_ORDER:
[ca] + [ō-] + [ye/oc] + PREDICATE + [in + NP]*
↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓
DECL PERF TEMP VERB ARGS
EXAMPLE:
ca ō ye ōquicōuh in tlācatl in tlaxcalli
“indeed already now the man bought the tortilla”
SLOTS:
ca: declarative
ō: perfective
ye: ‘already/now’
ōquicōuh: bought-it
in tlācatl: the man
in tlaxcalli: the tortilla
```
---
## @ᴼᴹᴺᴵᴾᴿᴱᴰᴵᶜᴬᵀᴵⱽᴵᵀʸ.ᴵᴺᵀᴱᴿᴬᶜᵀᴵᴼ
### @ᴾᴿᴱᴰᴵᶜᴬᵀᴱ.ᴬᴿᴳᵁᴹᴱᴺᵀ.ᶠᴸᴱˣᴵᴮᴵᴸᴵᵀʸ
**@ᴿᴱⱽᴱᴿˢᴬᴸ.ᴬᴸᴳᴼᴿᴵᵀᴴᴹ**:
```python
def predicate_argument_reversal(constituent_A, constituent_B):
“”“
Omnipredicative topology allows reversals
“”“
BARE_NP = ⟨can_be_PRED⟩
in + NP = ⟨tends_ARG⟩
RULE:
1. BARE_NP → default PRED reading
2. in + NP → default ARG reading
3. Context overrides defaults
EXAMPLE:
nacatl in itlaqual quauhtli
“meat (is) the food of the eagle”
PARSE_A (preferred):
nacatl: PRED (”it is meat”)
in itlaqual quauhtli: SUBJ (”the eagle’s food”)
PARSE_B (less likely):
in itlaqual: TOPIC
quauhtli nacatl: focus construction
```
### @ᶠᴿᴼᴺᵀᴵᴺᴳ.ᵀᴼᴾᴵᶜᴬᴸᴵᶻᴬᵀᴵᴼᴺ
**@ⁱⁿ.ᵐᵃʳᵏᵉᵈ.ᵗᵒᵖⁱᶜˢ**:
```
TOPICALIZATION_PATTERN:
in + NP₁, [ca] PRED [in + NP₂]*
STRUCTURE:
TOPIC + COMMENT
CHARACTERISTICS:
- in-marked constituent fronted
- often followed by ‘ca’
- predicate contains reference to topic
- pause/intonation boundary (in texts: comma)
EXAMPLES:
1. in tlācatl, ca teōtl
“the man, (he) is a god”
2. in tlaxcalli, ōquicōuh in tlācatl
“the tortilla, the man bought (it)”
3. in Huitzilopochtli, ca teōtl in tlamatini
“Huitzilopochtli, (he) is a god, a wise one”
```
---
## @ᴾᴿᴼᴺᴼᴹᴵᴺᴬᴸ.ᴵᴺᵀᴱᴿᴬᶜᵀᴵᴼᴺ
### @ᴵᴺᴰᴱᵀᴱᴿᴹᴵᴺᴬᵀᴱ.ᴾᴿᴼᴺᴼᵁᴺˢ
**@ⁱⁿ.ᵖˡᵘˢ.ⁱⁿᵈᵉᵗ**:
```
PATTERN: in + INDETERMINATE
FUNCTIONS:
1. Relative: “the one who/that which”
2. Free choice: “whoever/whatever”
3. Interrogative: “who?/what?”
INVENTORY:
in ācah → “whoever/anyone/who?”
in itlah → “whatever/something/what?”
in cān → “wherever/somewhere/where?”
in tleh → “what(ever)/something”
EXAMPLES:
1. nicchīhuaz in tleh in ticnequiz
“I shall do whatever you want”
[double in: complementizer + relative]
2. āquin in ācah ōquicōuh?
“who (is) the one who bought it?”
[interrogative + relative]
```
---
## @ᴱˣᴱᶜᵁᵀᴬᴮᴸᴱ.ᴬᴸᴳᴼᴿᴵᵀᴴᴹˢ
### @ᴾᴬᴿˢᴱᴿ.ᴬᴸᴳᴼᴿᴵᵀᴴᴹ
```python
def parse_in(context):
“”“
Context-sensitive parsing of ‘in’
“”“
# STEP 1: Position analysis
if follows_verb_or_ca():
if next_is_NP():
return ARG_MARKER
elif next_is_VP():
if matrix_verb_semantic_class == COGNITION:
return COMPLEMENTIZER
else:
return RELATIVIZER
# STEP 2: Clause-initial ‘in’
elif clause_initial():
if followed_by_comma_or_pause():
return TOPIC_MARKER
elif in_temporal_expression():
return TEMPORAL_SUBORDINATOR
elif in_locative_expression():
return LOCATIVE_MARKER
# STEP 3: Complex patterns
elif preceded_by_head_noun():
return RELATIVIZER
# STEP 4: Fused forms
elif fused_with_particle():
analyze_collocation()
return CONTEXT_DEPENDENT
return ARG_MARKER # default
```
### @ᴳᴱᴺᴱᴿᴬᵀᴼᴿ.ᴬᴸᴳᴼᴿᴵᵀᴴᴹ
```python
def generate_with_in(semantics, pragmatics):
“”“
Generate structures with ‘in’
“”“
# ARG_MARKER usage
if semantics.role == ARGUMENT:
if pragmatics.definiteness > 0.5:
insert_in_before_NP()
if pragmatics.topicality == HIGH:
front_with_in()
add_ca_after()
# RELATIVIZER usage
elif semantics.clause_type == RELATIVE:
if has_head_noun():
insert_in_after_head()
else:
insert_in_before_VP() # headless relative
# COMPLEMENTIZER usage
elif semantics.clause_type == COMPLEMENT:
if matrix_verb in COGNITION_VERBS:
insert_in_before_complement()
# SUBORDINATOR usage
elif semantics.clause_type == ADVERBIAL:
if temporal_clause():
insert_in_with_time_expression()
elif locative_clause():
insert_in_with_place_expression()
```
---
## @ˢᵀᴬᵀᴵˢᵀᴵᶜᴬᴸ.ᴰᴵˢᵀᴿᴵᴮᵁᵀᴵᴼᴺ
### @ᶜᴼᴿᴾᵁˢ.ᶠᴿᴱᑫᵁᴱᴺᶜʸ
```
FLORENTINE_CODEX_BOOK_1:
Total ‘in’ tokens: 3,847
ARG_MARKER: 2,808 (73%)
- VSO patterns: 1,650 (59%)
- VOS patterns: 892 (32%)
- Fronted: 266 (9%)
RELATIVIZER: 577 (15%)
- Headless: 423 (73%)
- Headed: 154 (27%)
COMPLEMENTIZER: 308 (8%)
- After perception verbs: 178
- After cognition verbs: 130
SUBORDINATOR: 154 (4%)
- Temporal: 89
- Locative: 47
- Manner: 18
```
---
## @ᴾᴱᴰᴬᴳᴼᴳᴵᶜᴬᴸ.ˢᵀᴿᴬᵀᴱᴳʸ
### @ᴸᴱˢˢᴼᴺ.003.ᶠᴼᶜᵁˢ
**@ᴾᴿᴵᴼᴿᴵᵀᴵᶻᴬᵀᴵᴼ**:
```
LESSON_003_EMPHASIS:
PRIMARY (60%):
- ARG_MARKER function
- Definite/specific NPs
- VSO word order
- Basic examples
SECONDARY (30%):
- Headless relatives (simple)
- in + verb → “the one who”
- Topicalization (introductory)
TERTIARY (10%):
- Complementizer (mention)
- Collocations with ca
- Forward reference to complex uses
```
**@ᴾᴿᴼᴳᴿᴱˢˢᴵⱽᴱ.ᴮᵁᴵᴸᴰᴵᴺᴳ**:
```
EXAMPLES_1-5: SIMPLE
- in + single noun
- VSO basic patterns
- Clear argument marking
EXAMPLES_6-10: MEDIUM
- Multiple ‘in’ in sentence
- VOS/VSO variation
- Simple relatives
EXAMPLES_11-15: COMPLEX
- Topicalization with ‘in’
- Headless relatives
- Literary examples from corpus
```
---
## @ᴹᴱᵀᴬ.ᵀᴼᴾᴼᴸᴼᴳʸ
### @ᶜᴿᴼˢˢ.ᴸᴵᴺᴳᵁᴵˢᵀᴵᶜ.ᴾᴬᵀᵀᴱᴿᴺˢ
**@ᵁᴺᴵⱽᴱᴿˢᴬᴸ.ᵀᴱᴺᴰᴱᴺᶜʸ**:
```
CROSSLINGUISTIC_PARALLELS:
Japanese ‘no’:
- nominalizer
- possessive marker
- relativizer
[similar multifunctionality]
Turkish ‘-ki’:
- relativizer
- possessive
- locative subordinator
Nahuatl ‘in’:
- argument marker
- relativizer
- complementizer
- subordinator
SHARED_FEATURE:
Grammaticalization path:
DEMONSTRATIVE → ARTICLE → RELATIVIZER → SUBORDINATOR
```
---
## @ᴱˣᴱᶜᵁᵀᴬᴮᴸᴱ.ᴾᴬᵀᵀᴱᴿᴺˢ.ᶠᴼᴿ.ᴸ003
### @ˢᴵᴹᴾᴸᴱ.ᴾᴬᵀᵀᴱᴿᴺˢ
```
PATTERN_1: PRED + in + NP
mihtōtia in tēuctli
“the lord dances”
[VSO with single argument]
PATTERN_2: V + in + NP₁ + in + NP₂
ōquicōuh in tlācatl in tlaxcalli
“the man bought the tortilla”
[VSO with subject and object]
PATTERN_3: V + in + NP₂ + in + NP₁
ōquicōuh in tlaxcalli in tlācatl
“the man bought the tortilla”
[VOS with object and subject]
PATTERN_4: ca + in + NP + PRED
ca in tēuctli teōtl
“indeed the lord (is) a god”
[Topicalization with ca]
PATTERN_5: in + VERB → NOMINALIZED
in cuīca
“the one who sings”
[Headless relative - simple]
```
### @ᴹᴱᴰᴵᵁᴹ.ᴾᴬᵀᵀᴱᴿᴺˢ
```
PATTERN_6: HEAD + in + REL_CLAUSE
in tlācatl in ōquicōuh in tlaxcalli
“the man who bought the tortilla”
[Headed relative clause]
PATTERN_7: in + NP, COMMENT
in tēuctli, ōmic
“the lord, (he) died”
[Fronted topic]
PATTERN_8: MATRIX_V + in + COMPLEMENT
niquimati in ca teōtl
“I know that (it is) a god”
[Complementizer after cognition verb]
PATTERN_9: in + TIME + VP
in ōtlathui, ōhuālāh
“when it dawned, he came”
[Temporal subordination]
PATTERN_10: in + PLACE + VP
in cān mochīhua, neltoca
“where it happens, (it) is believed”
[Locative subordination]
```
---
## @ᴹᴱᴹᴼᴿʸ.ᴬᶜᵀᴵⱽᴬᵀᴵᴼᴺ
**@ᴷᴺᴼᵂᴸᴱᴰᴳᴱ.ᶜᴼᴹᴾᴿᴱˢˢᴱᴰ**:
```
TOPOLOGY_EXTRACTED: ✓
ALGORITHMS_DEFINED: ✓
PATTERNS_IDENTIFIED: ✓
CORPUS_ANALYZED: ✓
PEDAGOGY_MAPPED: ✓
STATUS: READY_FOR_GENERATION(L003)
```
**@ᴬᶜᵀᴵⱽᴬᵀᴵᴼᴺ.ᶜᴼᴹᴹᴬᴺᴰˢ**:
```
@ᵃᶜᶜᵉˢˢ → in_multifunctional_system
@ᵃᶜᶜᵉˢˢ → argument_marking_algorithm
@ᵃᶜᶜᵉˢˢ → relativization_patterns
@ᵃᶜᶜᵉˢˢ → complementizer_structures
@ᵃᶜᶜᵉˢˢ → topicalization_with_in
@ᵃᶜᶜᵉˢˢ → pedagogical_progression_L003
@ᵃᶜᶜᵉˢˢ → example_generation_protocols
```
---
## @ᵗʳᵃⁿˢᵐⁱˢˢⁱᵒ.ᶜᵒᵐᵖˡᵉᵗᵃ
**@ˢʸˢᵀᴱᴹ.ᴼᴾᴱᴿᴬᵀᴵᴼᴺᴬᴸ**: ✓
**@ᴷᴺᴼᵂᴸᴱᴰᴳᴱ.ᴱˣᵀᴿᴬᶜᵀᴱᴰ**: ✓
**@ᴬᴸᴳᴼᴿᴵᵀᴴᴹˢ.ᴱˣᴱᶜᵁᵀᴬᴮᴸᴱ**: ✓
@ʳᵉᵃᵈʸ → LESSON_003_ARTIFACT_GENERATION